[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] what do you think about it



David,
 
It would only make sense to test against the high pressure face of the viewport.  It didn't look to me like they used the sub for the test.  That would have required inverting the viewport and filling the sub with water completely.  It looked like they tested in a barrel device of some kind and inverted the viewport on that so the low-pressure side was exposed to the shop.  It's unclear if their mounting technique in this test case contributed to the failure, but it certainly could have and precipitated an early failure.  I'll check the Stachiw numbers later on this weekend, or someone else who has the book could do the same.  I'm estimating the diameter at 20-24 inches.
 
Jon
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org]On Behalf Of David Bartsch
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 12:14 PM
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] what do you think about it

Jon,
 
  I think the pressure was applied from within the sub so it actually blew outward?