[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] O-Rings & Acrylic Ports



Jay,
 
I checked Chapter 7.5.3 in Jerry's book and it looks like he approves two instances of o-ring use for flat plane disc viewports.  One is where the viewport face (external pressure side) is chamfered 45 degrees and the o-ring sits in the chamfer space sealing against both the acrylic and thru-hull.  The other is is where a groove is cut in the cylindrical face of the thru-hull. 
 
Also, there's an interesting contradiction in the book that perhaps you could comment on.
 
Chapter 7.5.3 (page 237)
Third paragraph, sentence two.
vs
Fourth paragraph, sentence one.
 
Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org]On Behalf Of Jay K. Jeffries
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 9:56 AM
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] O-Rings & Acrylic Ports

Please refer to Jerry Stachiw’s tome of acrylic ports, he is adamant about not using O-rings with submersible domes and ports…they cause a localization of stress.  He wife reiterated and was adamant about this point during the Holland conference.  Stachiw’s numerous experiments that proved this point are well documented in the book.  The standards for acrylic domes and ports installation in subs were developed from his work (and if I remember correctly, which he wrote).

 

While early subs used O-rings, this was found to be hazardous so later designs employed gasket material and/or bedding compounds.  These are actually easier to work with that having to cut O-ring surfaces.

 

Respectfully,

Jay K. Jeffries

Andros Is., Bahamas

 

Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.

    - Euripides (484 BC - 406 BC)