| 
 Well Peter, 
that sounds awfully familiar so don't beat yourself up too much over it.  
Many years ago (like 30) I had a 16 foot aluminum water-skiing boat which I 
often used for ocean fishing as long as the weather was both calm and 
predictable.  At some point, I decided the boat needed new 
paint.  So I stripped everything off of it (windshield, tie-offs, 
speed-ometer, etc) and brought it to a local auto painter who duly did the 
job.  The boat went in white, and came out a beautiful tone of blue.  
I even named it and had my girlfriend letter-paint the name on both sides of the 
boat. 
  
Proud as a 
peacock with my newly painted boat, I decided to head out on the Atlantic for a 
day of fishing.  Nobody was available to join me at the time, but both the 
day and the ocean were flat-calm so I had no problem going out by myself.  
So I headed out about two miles from shore, threw over the anchor, and 
started fishing.  I was engrossed in the perfect day, the perfect water 
conditions, and just relaxing in my boat fishing.  A short time later, I 
noticed the carpet toward the back of the boat was damp.  Odd...it hadn't 
rained the night before and it was blistering hot this particular day.  
Hmmm...well, maybe a neighbor sprayed water in it accidentally while watering 
their lawn back at home, or maybe....yeah, must be that on my way out to the 
fishing area some water sprayed in...damn outboards. 
  
So I ignored 
the damp carpet and I continued to fish.  A short time later still, I 
stepped back again and now noticed that there was about two inches of water on 
the carpet at the back of the boat.  What???  I pulled back the 
partition at the stern where the gas tanks were located and it was flooded so 
badly that the tanks were floating.  It became obvious that water was 
entering through the stern and my boat was slowly sinking.  Here I 
was, two miles off shore, nobody else anywhere in sight (it was a weekday), 
no radio, no way to call for help, nobody knows exactly where I am, and my boat 
that I just spent hundreds of dollars repainting was going 
down. 
  
Its amazing 
the number of thoughts that go through your mind in such situation.  I 
figured if I was going to have to swim to shore, I was going to get as close as 
I could.  So I tried lifting the anchor, but couldn't.  I never had 
trouble raising the anchor before, but this time it was stuck.  Screw it, I 
cut the line and said goodbye to the anchor.  I started the engine and 
headed into shore.  If I could just get halfway there before the engine 
went under, I figured I could make it the rest of the way swimming.  I was 
able to plane the boat and it suddenly occurred to me that when it was planing, 
the water drain in the back of the boat was above the water line.  But I 
was by myself...how can I keep the boat going full speed, leave the wheel, and 
pull the plug??  Well, thank goodness there was nobody else near me because 
desperate times call for desperate measures.  I left the wheel with the 
boat at full throttle, went to the stern, scooched down and pulled the 
plug.  About 10 minutes later the water inside the boat had all drained 
out.  Just before getting back to the dock, again with the boat at full 
throttle, I left the wheel and returned to the stern to replace the water 
plug. 
  
I made it to 
the dock, got my trailer back down the ramp and loaded the boat on it.  All 
the way home I wondered what could have possibly happened?  I finally 
concluded that the auto shop must have dropped the boat and damaged the bottom, 
maybe popped some rivets that were now letting water in.  However, as I 
walked around the boat I noticed something.  The holes for the screws that 
held the transom based speed unit, were below the water line and in my haste to 
get the boat back on the water I had decided I didn't need a speedometer and so 
never reinstalled the unit.  Well, that was the source of my leak, which I 
confirmed after reinstalling the unit and putting the boat back in the 
water.  Talk about stupid!!! 
  
So Peter, you 
are not alone.   As we say here in the US, welcome to the 
club. 
  
Jon 
  
  Dear Psubbers,
 
  One of the things 
  that are quite seldom here is operational stories - what you experience when 
  going out with your subs. Half an hour ago Nautilus arrived at her base with 
  me a serious lesson richer - and here is the story...of the boyancy crisis and 
  how we almost lost control...
  Todays voyage was to start at 1400 hours, 
  with the crew arriving at 1300. We intended to take a joy ride through the 
  Copenhagen Harbor, and into the sound - ending at our northern base. Its about 
  8 nautical miles and we expected to sail for about two hours.
  We had a 
  very special crew, and a very special guest - Richard. R. is a "very high 
  ranking" retired US navy submariner - who at age 70 visited the Nautilus. He 
  has had the command of several US diesel and nuclear submarines. Also we had 
  Daniel, a former Danish navy submarine TKO - technical officer and one navy 
  surface ship navigator. Ad two navy seals - off duty - and you have a crew 
  with quite some experience. 
  Nautilus performed very well, and as we 
  passed the shipyard area where she was build, we came ashore and visited the 
  drydock where Kraka lies. She is operational, but disused and awaits going to 
  the Danish Technical Museum. All the crew were most happy, in no small part 
  Richard. The new coffee machine in the gally was tested and worked well. 
  
  Into the sound we increased speed to flank. We had three person in the 
  sail, no fuel in the tanks ( we run her from a jerrycan ) and all tanks blown. 
  As a result the stability margin is marginal - al as expected. We had som 
  osciliations giving some 30 deg. swings as we whent flank speed, som we 
  discussed ways to increase stabilty. One of the questions to be asked is if 
  the free uncontroled water surface in the main tanks will make the boat more 
  unstable than the potential stabilicing effect of the boat deaper in the 
  water. To test this we came to stop, and manually wented air from the fwd and 
  rear main ballast tanks. 
  The boat is not finished. There are no 
  blowing tubes or valves inside, but form outside - via a hose you can blow the 
  tanks. Also the diving valves at this stage can only be operated from outside. 
  
  The fwd. valve was opened, and this tank floded about 50 %. The rear 
  tank was opened, and it floded about 50 %. Nautilus was lying at a deep trim - 
  her fwd hatch closed, and with a free board of about 2 meters to the sail 
  hatch. Aparently stable...
  Then one of the deck crew reports - "Sir, - 
  we are still sinking in the stern" And yes - the rear diveplane was now slowly 
  submerging...ok - I go check the valve, its closed and tight...but we are 
  still sinking slowly...water begins covering the rear deck...
  I gues I 
  build submarines in part to feal that thrill...Ups...did we mis a step here 
  ?...like mission control in Houston you start to figure out - what in the hell 
  is going on - while staying calm. You try to be in advance of the situation - 
  How deep will we except this to go - what actions need to be taken - how much 
  boyancy do we have in the sail - what is the mechanisem behind 
  this...
  Then mr. Madsen, Master and Comander of his home made submarine 
  flotilla - realises that the rear trim tank - enourmours at some 1.5 m3, is 
  floding uncontroled due to a flange remowed ( to mount the new tube. ) 
  
  Frankly - at this point I did not know when this was going to be 
  stable. We could have ended up much like the U-505 ( se pic from her US navy 
  capture ) with only the top of the sail and the bow above water. If so, I 
  would have ordered the sail hatch closed - engine shut down and the crew out 
  of the engineroom and on deck. Likely our fwd hatch would never have gone 
  under since most of the bouyancy in the bow was still there. At the end - with 
  both hatches closed the boat would stay surfaced a some angle, but holy shit, 
  how stupid can a man be ? 
  As it was Nautilus stabiliced with the water 
  just below the deck level, and with the bow at about normal trim. No problem 
  at all, Kraka has lived her life like that - but this was not because of my 
  talent or smartness, no - just simple luck. 
  Carsten and his Germans 
  will now tell me how stupid I am - and I agree. I for my part told Richard the 
  story of the Seydlitz, a German WWI battlecruiser returning to port after the 
  Battle of Jutland with all of the fore deck under water...only to be repaired 
  and returned to service...and scuttled at Scarpa.
  The good thing about 
  it was that everybody was calm and working together to finde the cause - and 
  we quickly did - and then we continued at slow first. Indeed with her tanks 
  part floded Nautilus was far more stable, and we increased to flank speed 
  while seeing the bow raising under the hydrodynamic force of the rear planes. 
  ( so are we going to sink when we slow down ?! )
  We did not - we got 
  fine to port, blew the tanks, and there she is safe and sound. 
  
  Richard, our navy comander - gave me a US Navy officers badge, and 
  said a lot of nice things - that I really fell I don´t deserve after this 
  ordeal that was all my fault - but I have decided to learn from it. Not so 
  much in the detail - since its a specialty - that we will never see again, but 
  as a lesson in the safe operation of big dangerous machines. I may sound 
  stupid, but whenever you get to the edge of what you have done before, slow 
  down, analyse carefully before taking the next sted. I failed to do so - 
  because of the exelent way the boat and crew was performing in other 
  irralevant ways.
  The missing part for that flange cost about 2 US 
  doller.
  Have a nice day - and don´t play with water with out adult 
  attention...
  Best regards,
  Peter
  
 |