Thomas,
You monitor your blood gas composition with symptoms (first symptom,...
gee
it's a bit stuffy in here), which was my aim in the post, my apologies for
not being a bit more clear.
If you control the atmosphere that you breath, you will by default,
directly
effect your blood gas composition...immediately.
All of this gets a bit more dicey when you start mucking around with
pressure. particularly where 02 and CO2 are concerned.
This thread is very relevant where safety is concerned and a quick inquiry
with a knowledgeable source regarding maintaining constant cabin pressure
while introducing external life support O2, confirmed for me the hazards
and
care required in developing a final workable system.
An interesting solution that requires more study on my part, is the
intermittent (as opposed to constant flow) injection of external O2 via
2cd
stage regulator as CO2 is absorbed by the canisters, thereby maintaining a
constant pressure.
Don't ask me the specific mechanics of this as it is a new concept to me
but, one apparently used in commercial circles.
I am by no means there yet but, when issues like this pop up on the forum,
we are all well advised to perk up, take notice and refresh our knowledge
base.
I'll tell you one thing, when the time does come, I will take a more than
passing glance at hyperbaric physiology.
Joe
>From: "Thomas Doster" <thomas.doster@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
>To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
>Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Regulator pression - Korea plastic
sub
>- Hello Bob and P
>Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:44:02 -0400
>
>I'm not sure how relevant the blood composition is. It might be more
>useful to know the composition of gases in the atmosphere. Afterall,
>our bodies do the rest, as long as the atmosphere is pretty close to
>being correct. What I mean is, it's easier to control what goes into
>your lungs than it is to control what goes into your blood.
>
>According to this site:
>http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7a.html
>Nitrogen: 78.08%
>Oxygen: 20.95%
>Water (vapor): 0 to 4%
>Carbon Dioxide: 0.036%
>Neon: 0.0018%
>Also found are Helium, Methane, Hydrogen, Nitrous Oxide, and Ozone.
>For the purposes of psub discussion, the most important figures are
>that of Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen (which we'll lump all the
>other gases with).
>
>Now, a lot of folks think "Hey! There's hardly any Carbon Dioxide
>compared to Oxygen! But, remember, over-abundance of CO2 will kill you
>in a submarine before lack of oxygen. And "over-abundance" might mean
>one-tenth of one percent. So CO2 scrubbing is generally a good idea to
>start with.
>
>On 8/30/06, Joseph Perkel <joeperkel@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Hi Thomas,
>>
>>Always good to know the norms, below is a normal arterial blood gas.
>>Hypercapnia is the medical term for your question, here's a link
>>describing
>>scenarios and symptoms.
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercapnia
>>
>>
>>Arterial blood gases (at sea level and breathing room air)
>>
>>Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2):
>> 70?100 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)
>>
>>Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2):
>> 35?45 mm Hg
>>
>>pH:
>> 7.35?7.44
>>
>>Bicarbonate (HCO3):
>> 21?28 milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L)
>>
>>Oxygen content (O2CT):
>> 15%?23% (15?23 milliliters [mL] per 100 mL of blood)
>>
>>Oxygen saturation (O2Sat):
>> 95%?100%
>>
>>
>> >From: "Thomas Doster" <thomas.doster@gmail.com>
>> >Reply-To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
>> >To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
>> >Subject: Re: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Regulator pression - Korea plastic
sub
>>-
>> >Hello Bob and Paul
>> >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:24:01 -0400
>> >
>> >On the note of life support, simply adding oxygen as it's used might
>> >not be a completely viable option. I'm not a doctor or scientist, but
>> >even though you're replacing oxygen that you've used, you're still
not
>> >getting rid of the CO2 that you've added. I think 10% CO2 is lethal
>> >(less? anyone know the answer?) even with 50% or more O2. The normal
>> >amount of O2 in the air is about 20%. Now, when you're adding O2
>> >you're adding to the overall gas in the cabin, and thereby driving
>> >down the percentage of CO2, but I would imagine that it would catch
up
>> >eventually. One might even say too soon to make it a reasonable
>> >approach to life support systems.
>> >
>> >An interesting option for relieving pressure would be to have vaccuum
>> >flasks inside the pressure hull. I'm not sure how worthwhile it would
>> >be to add pressure vessels holding a vaccuum. The purpose would be to
>> >take away the pressure added by the O2 being leaked into the cabin.
>> >Still going to run into too much CO2 though.
>> >
>> >I could be terribly wrong about all this, and if I am, I'd like to
>> >know. Just something to think about though.
>> >
>> >-Tom D
>> >
>> >On 8/30/06, Fanta <fanta590@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>Hello Bob and Paul,
>> >>Thank you very much for your advice, it is very useful for me.
Please
>>tell
>> >>me: the plan sale in the site Lake sub, is it a real plan? is it
>>serieuse?
>> >>are there some buy and construction succeed?
>> >>thank you again
>> >>Fanta
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Bob Duncan <katsurencho@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>Yes, Metal Anomality Detector(MAD), the stinger on the tail of the
P3.
>>I
>> >>don't know about the uproar, i'm sure there was. The P3 can fly low
and
>> >>slow, which has been an advantage. The disadvantage was that those 4
>>big
>> >>fans could be heard by the submarine miles away. Or even 2 big fans,
>> >>'cause
>> >>they often shut down one, and sometimes 2 engines to save fuel at
low
>> >>altitude.
>> >> The British have or had (i really don't keep up) the Nimron, who's
>> >>disadvantage was that it couldn't fly so slow. Easy to overfly the
>>target.
>> >>It's more related to the 737 than a P3.
>> >> Technology has soared so fast over the years. I flew in P3's in
the
>> >>early
>> >>'80's and Moffett Field is all NASA now, the Navy moved out. Sound
>>travels
>> >>so fast and well in water. It's the easiest way to detect something
>> >>underwater that has the potential to move. Every machine has a
>>signature,
>> >>electric motors, shafts turning, people talking. Electronics usually
>>put
>> >>out
>> >>some RF, even if it's very slight. People talking probably not part
of
>>the
>> >>machine signature!!
>> >> You can have 2, 283 (i'm old, i think they call them 6Ltr) Chevy
>> >>engines
>> >>built at the same place by the same people, and they will have 2
>>different
>> >>signatures. The sound the crankshaft makes, the sound the pistons
make.
>> >>Once
>> >>your engine is heard, it's signature is put into a computer, then
when
>>it
>> >>is
>> >>heard again, it is recognized, and distinguishd from any other 283
>>engine,
>> >>or submarine.
>> >> I was flying P3's when CWO Johnny Walker was still in business.
The
>> >>Soviets just read all our top secret and any messages like reading a
>> >>newspaper. There is a movie about him "Family of Spies". During that
>>time,
>> >>the Soviets learned that we were detecting them by sound. So, they
>>started
>> >>making their subs quieter. It did make it more difficult, but not
>> >>impossible. Since then electronics have became far, far more
>> >>sophisticated.
>> >>
>> >> I don't know how Russian ships are now (or other former Soviet
>> >>countries),
>> >>and it's by no means my intent to speak adversly of them. In the
past
>>you
>> >>could always tell a Soviet ship from miles away, if you see a giant
>>rust
>> >>bucket on the water it was Soviet.
>> >>
>> >> As i understand the new P-8's are suppose to start showing up at
PAX
>> >>River
>> >>Naval Air Station (home of NAVAIR, Naval Aviation Test Center) next
>>year.
>> >>
>> >>Bob
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Paul Kreemer <paulkreemer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>Bob, does MAD trapping mean hiding in magnetic anomalies? Sounds
like
>> >>some
>> >>you've had some interesting experiences!
>> >>
>> >>And wasn't there a big uproar over replacing the P3 with the 737
versus
>>a
>> >>prop plane?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Paul
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>On 8/28/06, Bob Duncan <katsurencho@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Howdy
>> >> > Having been a P3 engineer at one time, VP-9, Moffett Field. You
>>could
>> >>avoid them if there were MAD trapping. But, usually they listen in
on
>> >>sonobouys.
>> >> > And the P3 is going away from the US Navy, the P8 is comming in
>>soon,
>> >>P-8 is a Boeing 737.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Paul Kreemer <paulkreemer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, PSUBers should consider plastic hulls to help avoid
detection
>>by
>> >>sub
>> >>hunting P-3 Orions. ;-) Regarding manufacture and use, this
>>cautionary
>> >>note from Dewey Mason sounds pretty informed on the subject:
>> >>http://www.psubs.org/faq.html#fiberglasshull
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Here are a couple of notes on cabin air from the PSUBS site. The
>>cabin
>> >>pressure would increase more slowly if you could add only oxygen and
>>not
>> >>air. And if your dive time is short enough you may not need to do
>> >>scrubbing
>> >>or oxygen replacement.
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.psubs.org/faq.html#cabinair
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.psubs.org/faq.html#lifesupport
>> >> >
>> >> > A lot of design decisions here... Like many more experienced
>>members
>> >>have
>> >>done, let me suggest buying some Kittredge plans. You can get the
>>K-250
>> >>or
>> >>K-350 plans here: http://johnmaynard.tripod.com/
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > take care-
>> >> > Paul
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 8/26/06, Fanta < fanta590@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Hello everyone,
>> >> > > I am doing some calculate on the paper about the air pression
>>inside
>> >>of
>> >>the pocket sub.
>> >> > > If I use a tank of compression air for supply air to pilot, the
>> >>pression
>> >>inside of cabine up slowly, it need an system automatic depression,
it
>> >>means: return the pression as 1 atm. Here, some one has an idea
about
>>this
>> >>system? Please drop for me a plan or some idea.
>> >> > > The second problem is carbonic air is up and I want to filtre
air.
>> >>Have
>> >>you some advices about this?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I hear about sub spy of North Korean, base on information 3
years
>> >>ago,
>> >>its made by plastic !! diver very limit but low price and it is
enough
>>for
>> >>past many stations control in South Korea. North Korea use this type
>>for
>> >>infiltration to South Korea, Are there someone here have more
>>information
>> >>about this type sub? I do interesting this because it is confortable
>>for
>> >>poor amateur sub builder.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thank you very much
>> >> > > Fanta
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Love and Peace, God bless you
>> >> > >
>> >> > > ________________________________
>> >> All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things
>>done
>> >>faster.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Tejas is a Spanish spelling of a Native Amerian word which
>>translates
>> >>to
>> >>English as "Friend". There was a Mexican territory with this name.
But,
>> >>the
>> >>German settlers and other gringos came along and couldn't say it
right.
>> >>So,
>> >>it ended up Texas.
>> >> >
>> >> > ________________________________
>> >> All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things
>>done
>> >>faster.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> >> All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things
>>done
>> >>faster.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Love and Peace, God bless you
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> >>Do you Yahoo!?
>> >> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>************************************************************************
>>
>************************************************************************
>>
>************************************************************************
>> >The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
>> >CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our database
>> >because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive
messages
>> >from our organization.
>> >
>> >If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
>> >link below or send a blank email message to:
>> > removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
>> >
>> >Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
>> >automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
>> >our server receiving your request.
>> >
>> >PSUBS.ORG
>> >PO Box 311
>> >Weare, NH 03281
>> >603-529-1100
>>
>************************************************************************
>>
>************************************************************************
>>
>************************************************************************
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>************************************************************************
>>************************************************************************
>>************************************************************************
>>The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
>>CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our database
>>because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
>>from our organization.
>>
>>If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
>>link below or send a blank email message to:
>> removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
>>
>>Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
>>automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
>>our server receiving your request.
>>
>>PSUBS.ORG
>>PO Box 311
>>Weare, NH 03281
>>603-529-1100
>>************************************************************************
>>************************************************************************
>>************************************************************************
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>************************************************************************
>************************************************************************
>************************************************************************
>The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
>CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our database
>because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
>from our organization.
>
>If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
>link below or send a blank email message to:
> removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
>
>Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
>automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
>our server receiving your request.
>
>PSUBS.ORG
>PO Box 311
>Weare, NH 03281
>603-529-1100
>************************************************************************
>************************************************************************
>************************************************************************
>
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our database
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
from our organization.
If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
link below or send a blank email message to:
removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
our server receiving your request.
PSUBS.ORG
PO Box 311
Weare, NH 03281
603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************