| 
 From the information available about the sale of 
Needlefish, photos, and comments, I am of the opinion that Needlefish does not 
work.  I likely share this opinion with many in the PSUB community, friend, 
or no friend to Mr. Gifford. 
I in no way mean to discredit Bill, afterall, he 
has at least built something, but I do believe that his handling of Needlefish 
could have been done differently.  If it works, prove it.  Photos, 
documents, test dive results....something.  If he has attempted to sail or 
dive it and has simply found there are problems with it's design, come clean 
with that fact to the PSUB community.  If we all weren't reasonably 
intelligent, we wouldn't be here.  It would be a shame if Bill was to lose 
credibility within the PSUB community as a result of the sale of 
Needlefish.  We can all stand to learn as much about what DOESN'T work as 
what does.  If Bill were to fully document the problems with Needlefish, 
where the design and construction went wrong, that would be an extremely 
valuable learning tool for many.  Unfortunately, Bill has to pay the price 
for that tool.  Is it any wonder so many of us are "designing to death" our 
PSUBS ?  We want them to work, we can not afford for them not to.  
Needlefish, to me, is a reminder of that. 
   An extremely expensive lesson ?  
No doubt.  A wasted effort ?  Not if Bill shares his knowledge 
concerning the design and construction of Needlefish.  A real possibility 
that someone could get killed in a sub with design flaws ?  You bet.  
I know which one I would have a hard time living with.........in my 
opinion.  I just hope he is completely up front with any potential 
buyers.  It doesn't do any of us any good to read on the front 
page: 
"Man gets killed in home made 
submarine" 
....Now, back to the drawing board for 
me. 
Myles. 
  |