[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PSUBS-MAILIST] inaccurate terms & inescapable that the Hunley was a hybrid.




 
     Hi Ian.
 
      It was by yours and Ray's definition that there are no manned 1 atm subs in existance. You and Ray told me that the pressure changes from venting
tanks into the hull and other variables cause a 1 atm sub to not technically always be 1 atm. If that is true, then why do we call them 1 atm in the first place?
 
I am trying to understand terms we use that seem to not always fit the pressures they describe.
 
When you and Ray described pressure variations to me that showed a 1 atmosphere sub to not always be 1 atmosphere, I mirrored what you said back to you in trying to
 
understand why we call something a certain term when upon close inspection that term shows to not always be an absolute.
 
Please understand, I am not trying to argue with you or Ray, I am trying to understand susposedly specific terms that upon close inspection appear to not
 
be absolute.  From yours and Rays descriptions of 1 atm subs frequently not being one atm, I wonder why we do not have an accurate term that IS an absolute for
 
what kind of sub they are. Your definition said 1 atm was "at or close to surface pressure". What does "close to surface pressure" mean? 1 pound of pressure? 10? 15? 100?  How do we determine a specific, accurate measurement for "close to"?
 
That's kind of like attorneys arguing over what is "Reasonable". As much as I am not very good at it, I think we need mathematical figures here.
 
It would seem to me that the only accurate way one could catagorize what type of sub would be to measure the pressures in the boat during her sea trials during different situations and then
 
using 1 atm as the starting point baseline, show those pressure variables as numbers and then catagorize the sub by a baseline of 1 atm to whatever the largest of the numeric pressure variables were.
 
That would then be an accurate term. For example like this...."This sub is 1 atm to  16.2 lbs of pressure". The 16.2 being the largest of the pressure variable spikes experienced during her sea trials.
 
Wouldn't that be more accurate than incorrectly calling something 1 atm when it frequently is not? 
 
 
Ian, you wrote..."I don't see any reason the ballast tank design of a submarine has any effect on whether it's a 1ATM or ambient".
 
 
In the case of the Hunley with her open to the hull interior ballast tanks it does make a difference and have an affect Ian. I explained the reasons in an earlier post but will do so here for you again.
 
I may well be wrong in thinking that the Hunley is a COMPLETELY ambient sub, but she does have attributes and qualities of being ambient in her design.
 
Let's analyze  them.
 
1. An ambient sub allows water to enter its INTERIOR to dive. The Hunley did this with her open top and open to the hull interior ballast tanks.
 
2. The water pressure entering the sub's interior when an ambient sub dives, compresses the atmosphere in the sub's interior just as it did with the Hunley.
 
3. An ambient sub uses air to force water out of the sub's INTERIOR to surface, just as they did with the Hunley.
 
 
In fact Ian, the Hunley has more in common with an ambient sub than it does with a 1 atm sub. If they just had the ONE addition on board of pressurized air tanks and left the ballast tank valves open and used the air tanks to keep the water 
 
from spilling over the open top, open to the hull interior ballast tanks, she would have been COMPLETELY ambient. She was just one step away from being a completely ambient sub. But one off she was indeed.
 
The Hunley could CLOSE OFF her ballast tank's valves and thus prevent outside water from freely coming in without just using air pressure to keep the water out. WHEN the ballast tank valves were CLOSED OFF
 
the Hunley SWITCHED from being an ambient sub (letting water into her hull INTERIOR and compressing her atmosphere), and became a pressure hull sub.
 
Ambient subs do not prevent the water coming in by closing a valve like the Hunley did. They are ALWAYS open to the water coming in and keep it out by pressurized air pressure only. They have to use a pressurized air tank in order to do this.
 
Since the Hunley did not have pressurized air tanks she could not do this and deviated from what we consider to be ambient by being able to close off any water coming in by closing her ballast tank valves.
 
When she SWITCHED from ambient operation to pressure holding by closing her ballast tank valves, she became a pressure hull and her atmosphere was compressed and no longer at 1 atm.
 
 
 
IF we accept the above 3 listed ambient qualities of the Hunley, then we have to conclude that when she dove with her ballast tank valves open and compressed her atmosphere, she was acting as an ambient sub at that time.
 
Then when she closed her flooded ballast tank valves, she became a pressure hull.
 
Then when she opened her ballast tank valves again and used her compressed interior atmosphere to pump the water out, she was acting as ambient again. Then when the water was all pumped out
 
she closed her ballast tank valves again and became 1 atm pressure hull again.
 
She had to be switching back and forth from 1 atm pressure hull on the surface, to pressurized ambient upon diving, to compressed atmosphere pressure hull, to ambient using her compressed atm to pump the water out, then back to 1 atm again!
 
 
Unless anyone can correctly dispute the above listed ambient qualities of the Hunley's design, then we must conclude that she was in fact a hybrid having both qualities of an ambient, and a pressure hull sub.
 
She also switched from being a 1 atm pressure hull sub at the surface, to having her atmosphere compressed when she dove making her no longer a 1 atm sub, then when she pumped the water out of her ballast tanks, she became 1 atm again.
 
So we cannot call her a 1 atm sub, because she sometimes was not. She wasn't a 1 atm sub, she also wasn't COMPLETELY ambient. She was a combination of the two. A HYBRID. 
 
It's all due to the Hunley's open top and open to the hull interior ballast tank design.
 
Now do you see the reason Ian why the design of the ballast tanks had an effect on whether the Hunley was ambient or 1 atm?
 
Comments? 
 
Kindest regards,
 
Bill Akins.
 
 
 
 
 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] When is ambient, ambient and 1 atmosphere, 1 atmosphere?


By your definition, there are no manned 1ATM submarines in existance
(even breathing will change the internal cabin pressure).

Definitions:
  1ATM:  Pressure resistant hull, internal pressure is at or close to
         surface pressure.

  Ambient: Non-pressure resistant hull, internal pressure matches
           external pressure.

I don't see any reason the ballast tank design of a submarine has
any effect on whether it's a 1ATM or ambient.

Ian.