Interesting topic... Snoopy's behavior is very different to what you describe with the rocking. Blowing ballast empties the tanks almost instantaneously, so there is no rocking at all. When flooding the tanks, on the other hand, it's a slow motion process that takes (off the top of my head) about a minute. I do find that invariably one end of the sub settles faster than the other, so I open and close the vent valves alternatively to keep it level. Dale very thoughfully mounted a bubble level longitudinally on the inside of the sail, and it's quite useful for this. Another test I've thought of doing is to try and figure out if there is consistency with which ballast tank empties faster, and add an adjustable orifice of some sort to the faster venting valve, so that I could eventually adjust the venting rates to be equal. cheers, Alec -----Original Message----- From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org on behalf of Dan H. Sent: Thu 4/28/2005 7:59 AM To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org Cc: Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] glassed-in ballast tanks Alec, I think I follow what your describing. Try it and see if your satisfied. Your testing will prove it, one way or the other. I can't imagine the sub turning totally nose up or nose down just because of the weight placement in the overall design. Now that we discussed this, I think I'm going to try some of the same one ballast tank tests sometime when I have help around to see how my sub reacts. With the battery pods so low on the K-350, it shouldn't get to vertical. In my first sub trials I got carried away with flipping valves and got Persistence rocking quite a bit. It was enough that I became concerned, what would happen if my 400 pounds of removable lead weights slid forward across the deck and ended up in a pile against the end of the hull. I thought I would become a bobber for sure. I didn't know you had both of your air tanks plumbed in all the time. I don't think the Captain designed it that way. Most likely Dale decided on that. I only have one tank connection but carry two tanks. I run off one tank, and if I run low in that one, I switch the regulator over to the other. I get several dives out of each tank but have decided to never take more then one dive out of the second tank until I replace the first. I use it like a reserve tank until I get the replacement full tank on board. I'll be in Fla. in early June and in Europe while your in Fla. We'll definitely get together in Maryland someday though. Keep me posted with your testing. Good luck, Dan H. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alec Smyth" <Alec.Smyth@compuware.com> To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 10:42 PM Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] glassed-in ballast tanks > Hi Dan, > > I remember you making that comment some months back about the bleed holes, and it made me think about this issue. Snoopy carries two SCUBA tanks for blowing ballast. Since one of the tanks also blows the VBT, it tank empties considerably before the other. I presume the most likely cause for doing a buoy impersonation would be if you blew ballast and one of the SCUBA tanks was empty while the other was full. Lets say for sake of argument you successfully blew the forward tank and the rear one remained flooded, thus putting the sub severely nose up. If you found yourself in that predicament, what one would do is switch tanks, to blow aft ballast with the remaining air. I presume the issue is that depending on the location and depth of the aft tank lower opening, you could find that air injected into the aft tank would escape through the bottom of the tank rather than rise inside it. That would prevent the stern from rising. Plan B would be to lower the bow, but you couldn't do that either because the vent is at the rear of the forward tank. Thus the buoy attitude would become permanent. If I had the small vent holes in the forward tank, it would slowly flood, and I could switch tanks in the meantime, waiting until the angle was a little less radical before blowing aft ballast. I presume this is the reasoning behind the Captain's comment, and I can't see any gaps in it. > > However, perhaps Kittredge was not thinking of stovepipes that protrude downwards from the tanks. If the stovepipe were located such that I can blow tanks even with an extreme angle on the boat, then I would rather like to switch tanks without losing any of my scarce air. For this reason, when Snoopy is back together I'm planning to conduct a simulation before drilling those little holes. The test is to blow one ballast tank only, and see if at the greatest angle possible I can or cannot still blow the second tank. This obviously would be done with someone standing by to assist. If the stovepipes do the trick, I think I'll keep the tanks un-drilled. > > I really appreciate your having made that comment, because it was a scenario that had not occurred to me, and led me to think about the placement and depth of the stovepipes. D'you think my reasoning is sound? > > I'm planning on being in FL from July 18th to 28th. Let me know if you'd like to convoy down with two subs, that would be terrific. > > > thanks, > > Alec > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan H. [mailto:jmachine@adelphia.net] > Sent: Wed 4/27/2005 5:48 PM > To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] towing requirements > > > Alec, > > If it helps, my 350 has a 3 Hp aft thruster and two 3/4 Hp side thrusters and it moves along. Exactly how fast is just a guess but I'd say about five MPH. Total 4 1/2 Hp. As you probably know 9 Hp won't move you twice as fast. > > A note on glassing in the under side of the soft tanks, I was talking to Captain Kittredge when I was doing mine and her mentioned to be sure to drill a few holes in the most forward and aft ends of the tanks to insure any trapped air would bleed out if you ended up nose of tail straight up like a buoy. I drilled two 5/8 holed in each end of mine. They don't burp out at the ends anyway. > > Where in Fla. are you going and when? I'll be near Fort Myers in a few weeks but I won't have the opportunity to take Persistence. :-( > > Dan H. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Alec Smyth <mailto:Alec.Smyth@compuware.com> > To: PSUBS <mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org> > Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:12 AM > Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] towing requirements > > Hi all, > > I’m planning a trip to South FL, and have run into the issue of finding a tow boat for a K-250, since I would need to do tows of 4 to 7 miles each way in open water. One option is to purchase an inflatable, and they come in a huge range of sizes and engine capacities. Smaller is better for me, but only so long as it’s not TOO small. Any little tender with a whimpy motor will move a K boat to some extent, but for those who have “been there done that”, what do you consider would be appropriate for open water use, for example getting home against the Gulf Stream? If I can decide on 35 HP, 50 HP, etc. I can work that back to a matching boat. > > The sub itself, BTW, I have modified for towing by glassing in the ballast tanks and using stove-pipes, so that they don’t “burp” as much. > > > > Thanks, > > Alec > ************************************************************************ ************************************************************************ ************************************************************************ The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our database because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages from our organization. If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the link below or send a blank email message to: removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an automated process and should be complete within five minutes of our server receiving your request. PSUBS.ORG PO Box 311 Weare, NH 03281 603-529-1100 ************************************************************************ ************************************************************************ ************************************************************************ The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.
<<winmail.dat>>