[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] leak detector actuated auto equalization system in battery pods. Bill Akins.



Title: Message
Actually Greg, I think I made a mistake.
 
With the automatic pressure equalization system I spoke of and you referenced, it would automatically put air in when the water level rose. In a half dry sub like the Markham silent runner 2, you might not want this system to add air automatically.
That means when you operated the variable buoyancy vavle I spoke of to raise the water level in the cockpit and thus decend, that automatic equalization system would kick in and fill the cockpit back up which you wouldn't want it to do because then
you could not decend. So on thinking about it more, it is a great idea for keeping the equalization of the battery pod and motor, but not the best for a half dry ambient sub since it wouldn't allow you to let the water level rise in the cockpit to decend.
The only way I can think of that it would work and be helpful  would be if you used ballast tanks that were seperate from the cockpit so that if the cockpit were always full of air you could still decend using the ballast tanks. Then in that case you
would not even need the variable buoyancy valve. You would just always have your cockpit full of air from the pressure equalization system (and co2 from your exhaling if you didn't exhaust your co2 somehow)and use the external ballast tanks to dive and surface. You would still have to breath thru a scuba regulator or rig the cockpit to breath in ONLY
thru your nose and still have to breath your co2 out thru a mouthpiece with a one way valve thru the cockpit into the water.
 
Kindest Regards,
Bill Akins. 
----- Original Message -----
From: Akins
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 5:58 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] leak detector actuated auto equalization system in battery pods. Bill Akins.

 I think it would work for that Greg. the only thing is as you decend deeper if you are in a dry ambient or half dry ambient you are now in a dry part that is pressurized and those pressures are working on putting nitrogen into your bloodstream just like
a diver who is diving deep enough. Same thing. Whereas in a 1 atmosphere sub the pressure on you inside the sub never changes. But if you just used the dry or half dry sub at normal scuba depths, I don't see why it wouldn't work just as well as regular diving.
I was thinking the same thing when I read it, that not only would it be good to equalize a battery pod and motor housing, but also you could incorporate it into an ambient half dry sub like Kent Markum's silent runner two. The site I found those URL's at was a yahoo
group called robotrov which is a site for building homemade underwater ROV's. Here's the URL for that site if you care to visit or join it. Lots of good minds and info there.   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/robotrov/  They helped me out a lot.
I found those diagrams and schmatics for the pressure equalization system under "files" at that site. Amazing what you can dig up online isn't it? Lol.
 
Oh one other thing, the water pressure interface in a half dry ambient sub is regulated by a tube that pivots within the cockpit. When the tube is under water your air stays in the cockpit. When you pivot the tube up into the air in the cockpit, the water level rises
within the cockpit. See Kent Markum's plans for this in the Silent runner 2 sub he built and sells plans for. Here's a link to a site that shows what I am talking about.  http://www.scubatow.com/images/sub2/012.jpg click on that one and look at the
variable buoyancy vavle at the left of the drawing. Save it and enlarge it in photoshop to read it better. It shows how this tube works to control the amount of air in the cockpit. You could use this variable buoyancy valve in conjunction with the automatic
pressure equalization system. The buoyancy valve would allow you to bleed off however much air you wanted where the automatic pressure equalization system would just keep you equalized without allowing you to regulate how much air to bleed off
on your own. Putting the two together seems like it would make a good combination. Also look at this link.  http://www.scubatow.com/sub2.html
 
 
Kindest Regards,
Bill Akins.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:00 AM
Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] leak detector actuated auto equalization system in battery pods. Bill Akins.

Hi Bill -
Nice posts!  Why wouldn't this work as a pressure regulator for a dry ambient or a wet ambient sub.  I assume that the original wet sport sub used something like this or a float mechanism to regulate the water level (and thus the pressure) in the wet ambient.  A dry ambient would have to be the same idea with a chamber for the water/pressure interface that was external to the cockpit.
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of Akins
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:58 AM
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] leak detector actuated auto equalization system in battery pods. Bill Akins.

Here's the URL for an automatic pressure equalization system based on using a leak detector to determine when more air is needed in a battery pod
 
 
What I need to know is how does the signal from the leak detector make a valve open to vent air into the pod and close when the leak detector is dry again? And how do I hook it all up? It would seem that with a system like
this I would not even need my scuba regulator, but just a battery pod with an open tube on the bottom with leak sensor wires within the tube that would send a signal to a valve to vent air into the pod and keep the water down out
of the tube, then when I accend the excess air from expanding will simply vent out the bottom of the tube. Seems better than my original idea of the scuba regulator because it does the same thing and also detects leaks which
JUST my scuba regulator system would not. The other advantage of the open tube at the bottom is that I would only need to install ONE other fitting on the battery pod for a forced air vent system for eliminating hydrogen when charging.
 
Any thoughts on this design?
 
Kindest Regards,
Bill Akins.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Akins
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Wetsub carrier water transport systems

Dear Vance,
 
Your ideas on pontoon/pod combinations certainly have merit and I will consider them as the modification and refurbishment of my wetsub project ongoes.
I have purchased and plan to install a single 74lb thrust minnkota electric motor.
Your suggestion is excellent regarding putting in a forced vent system to rid hydrogen from the battery pod while I am charging, I plan to do that.
You spoke of sea water creating "green gas" from covering the batteries. I take it this is chlorine gas correct? I know hydrogen is highly explosive, but is chlorine gas
explosive as well?
 
 
What I need suggestions on now is how to rig the battery pod so I can recharge the batteries without removing the large end cap
and disturbing the O ring. I imagine it would be having some kind of waterproof cap that unscrews from a short tube coming out of the battery pod,
wherein I could access the wires to the batteries and hook them to the charger. Any suggestions on how to best accomplish this would be greatly appreciated.
Your warning about trash getting between the o ring and its bearing surface is one I will remember. I see from your experience how important it
is.
 
I know how to hook up my scuba regulator to equalize the battery pod and motor housing which will equalize together, but what I have been reading
about and want to install is a leak detector which will automatically detect any pod leaks and somehow warn me with a guage or warning light and will
automatically vent air into the pod that will force any water out thru the crack it came in or at least only allow a small amount of water to remain inside
that will not endanger the batteries until I could surface and get the pod out of the water. In order to stop any water entering a crack on the pod the air
pressure inside the pod would have to equal or exceed the outside water pressure and I need a leak sensor that would somehow tell my regulator when to
force air into the pod and when to shut off.
 
I have read and seen a drawing of a battery pod with a open tube on the bottom of it (similiar to a upside down glass underwater)
and the pod stays dry by the air pressure inside it always being greater than the outside water pressure. Then as the water pressure increases on diving, the water tries to go up further into
the tube under the pod, and as it does this it contacts and completes the circuit between two wires which goes to a device (what device? here is where I lose it) and this device
then somehow instructs how much air should be vented into the pod and when the air pressure blows the water down beyond the exposed sensor wires the device then instructs the
air to shut off until the water touches the wires again as you go deeper and water pressure increases beyond what your pod air pressure is again. Any advice or links or sites you or
anyone else knows of that has this kind of information that you could send me would be appreciated as well.
 
Ian from Psubs e mailed me and told me to post the photos of my wetsub at this Psubs link for uploading and sharing photos, which I did.   http://www.prismnet.com/~moki/subfiles.html 
I had previously tried to post photos here but when you include photos in this system it apparently not only does not allow your photos to go thru but also blocks your text as well. Twice before
I tried and neither the photos nor the e mail text appeared in my e mail as my text e mails normally come to me in my inbox when I send them out to the psubs mailist.
 
Bye the way Vance, what does "LRP" that you referred to in Hawaii mean and what did they do? The only thing I know about that term is "Long Range Patrol".
 
Kindest Regards,
Bill Akins.
 
 
 
 
 

Bill,

I think you're making too much of the various complications. You're going to build pontoons, and battery pods, and a compensation system anyway. It just seems like a reasonable alternative to build them as a unit. If not, have a look at the LRPs they used so successfully in Hawaii. If you're dealing with surface chop, then submerging the pontoons on their own ballast system would let you garage the wet sub without banging it up.

I don't know which design you are using, but it doesn't take much to stick three or four batteries in a tube for 50 to 75 psi service. If you are going to use one, and that is certainly reasonable, then put it inside and sit on it, or do like Perry and shove the whole thing aft and get it completely out of the way. One nifty solution was to combine all this. We mounted a 3 hp thruster on the back plate of the battery pod, sort of like a DPV on steroids, and built it into the stern with just the prop sticking out of a faired section and the rudder and nozzle mounted to that. It worked (and still works) fine.

What kind of motors? The big Minn-Kotas give you a lot of push, and they are cheap. A couple of those ought to get you around pretty well. If you want a hot rod, try four. They put 4 of the 3/4 hp permanent magnet thrusters on the back of the Lotus wet sub, and it ran great. Batteries were 4 X 6volt 220 amp Trojans in an oil filled box with a couple of wraps of tygon tubing for compensation. Cost about 500 bucks start to finish and never caused a problem.

However, I still prefer the dry pods. Put a forced vent system on it, so that you can charge without disturbing the seals, and you'll be a much happier camper. I once took a ride in the PC-9 with a leaky pod. The fellow who was piloting on that dive was new, and had failed to switch the leak detectors on--didn't realize it until we were on the bottom. We got home without dropping the emergency weight, but it was a near thing, and cost us fifteen out of twenty-four batteries on that side. Sea water and batteries make green gas, and will turn the whole thing into a gigantic bazooka, so keep that in mind. It made me very cautious about my o-rings, I can tell you that. A piece of paper match across the seating surface caused the leak--a very small piece, I might add. It doesn't take much.

Vance