| 
 I don't intended on drinking it, and it will be in 
a closed loop and sealed.  The fact that it is liquid makes it ideal for 
pumping from point A to point B.   
  
Brian 
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  
  Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 6:30 
  PM 
  Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] battery 
  acid? & battery issue follow up 
  
  
  The good news is that is weighs 246 pounds a quart. The bad is it's toxic 
  waste, and evaporates easily. It has gone from being expensive to being a 
  liability. My advice is stick with lead, slide it if you need to. 
  -Peter 
    
  
  
    Does anybody know where I can get some mercury 
    ? 
      
    Brian Cox 
    
      ----- Original Message -----  
      
      
      Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:04 
      PM 
      Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] battery 
      acid? & battery issue follow up 
      
  
      I can cast lead. 
        
      
      Carl, Sand 
        or gravel is to light for ballast in a sub. It's mass is so much 
        more then lead for the same weight that it's impractical in a compact 
        sub. A load of gravel in a pickup truck pretty much fills the box. If 
        it were lead, it would be a sheet on the bottom of the 
        floor. Remember it only the displacement over and above what the same 
        mass of water weighs that's effective as ballast.
  Dan 
        H. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Coalbunny" 
         To:  Sent: 
        Tuesday, February 17, 2004 5:49 AM Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] 
        battery acid? & battery issue follow up
 
  > Shawn, that 
        is something that I have wondered about- will the ballast > shift? 
        I have read how a number of scientific units used lead or steel > 
        shot. Is there anything that prohibits that being used? IIRC! at 
        one > time even mercury was used. Of course we know the 
        environmental > implications from that. One thing I thought of 
        using that should be > cost effective and would be environmentally 
        friendly is the use of sand > or gravel. But since I have no real 
        unit to use that ballast method > with, I have no idea if it'll 
        work. > Carl > > > NeophyteSG@aol.com 
        wrote: > > In a message dated 2/16/04 5:47:29 AM Pacific 
        Standard Time, > > Asmyth@changepoint.com writes: > 
        > > > Because Solo is intended as a "flying" sub, it's 
        designed to have a > > very small self-righting moment. [snip] 
        If Solo had conventional > > stability, she could never roll or 
        fly inverted. > > > > Totally understand. My design is 
        facing similar constraints except that > > all my nonessentials 
        are fared external to the pressure hull which, Sgt. > > 
        Pepper-ish, is much smalle! r than yours appears to be. In my case, 
        I'm > > juggling axiometric placement of everything in the 
        horizontal and > > vertical planes through the hull's 
        longitudinal axis, leaving the drop > > weight(s) placement 
        until near the end to essentially force the righting > > moment 
        equations to balance. I also liked the idea of essentially being > 
        > able to use just about everything except the pressure hull as a 
        drop > > weight should the absolute need arise. > 
        > > > What gave me a worse headache was trying to figure out 
        a functional > > ballast system for a craft which will 
        hypothetically have six degrees of > > freedom, won't "slosh" 
        around (changing the center of buoyancy), and > > will work no 
        matter what the orientation of the craft ... including > > 
        upside down. > > > > Given the batteries are snug 
        against the hull "ceiling", I can't > > reach the lu! gs to 
        connect the cables unless they are upside down. > > Plus, I 
        don't want the lugs shorting out against the hull. If they > > 
        cannot go upside down, I'll probably have to lower everything by > 
        > about 3". Plus, all the cables will now be a few inches too 
        short. > > > > Aside from simply not having the room, 
        you're making me glad that I > > chose to mount all but the two 
        emergency reserve batteries outboard ... > > not meaning to 
        take pleasure from your pain. :) > > > > > > 
        In a message dated 2/16/04 7:00:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, > 
        > Asmyth@changepoint.com writes: > > > > The 
        Lifelines can be used in any position, but only charged upright. > 
        > The Optimas can be used or charged in any position at all. > 
        > Unfortunately, I can't do a straight replacement because 
        Optima > > doesn't make a battery as large as the ones I'm 
        using. So it looks > > like I need to modify my hardware and 
        calculations to turn them > > right side up > 
        > > > FWIW, possible KISS solution: Incorporate a pivot and 
        latch into the > > mounting hardware whereby you can drop them 
        down into an upright > > position for charging -- when you 
        won't be occupying that space -- then > > latch them back 
        upside down and against the hull during dives. If the > > 
        current cabling reaches the lugs in their upside down position, 
        you > > won't even have to lengthen them because they'll just 
        need to rotate > > 180-degrees. Make sense? > 
        > > > Warm Regards > > Shawn > > > 
        > > > ***** > > > > "Call nothing thy own 
        except thy soul. > > Love not what thou art, but only what thou 
        may become. > > Do not pursue pleasure, for thou may have the 
        misfortune to overtake it... > >! ; Live in the vision of 
        that one for whom great deeds are done ..." > > > > 
        Man of LaMancha, D. Wasserman > > -- > Spotted 
        Owl...it's what's for 
      dinner. > >
 
  
  Fact is stranger than 
      fiction. Truth is stronger than fact. R. Duncan 
      
        
      Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get 
      your refund fast by filing online 
        
 |