[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Alternative to Through-Hull Ports for Electrical Connections
- To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
- Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Alternative to Through-Hull Ports for Electrical Connections
- From: "Ian Wright" <ianwrong@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:10:48 -0500
- References: <4.1.20031104220832.00be1420@mail.dbtech.net>
It's not an extra hull perforation if the optical transceivers beam through
a portion of an existing, rather than a "dedicated," viewport.
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Alford" <walford@dbtech.net>
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>; <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Alternative to Through-Hull Ports for
Electrical Connections
> At 03:42 AM 11/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > Someone in a thread a while back was pondering alternatives to actual
hull
> > perforations for transmitting electrical data (e.g., inductive). . . . I
> > envision a small acrylic viewport with optical transceivers on each
side.
>
>
> and yet that is a hull perforation
>
> William Alford
>