Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] concept query

["D. Blake" <dblake@bright.net>]

Why not just use the paint brush included with WIN95/98.  That is, as long
as critical measurements are not required.  It makes a nice sketch pad.  To
be extra nice, you could convert the .bmp to a .jpg before sending to save
space.  A picture is worth a thousand words as they say.
Big Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Marsee Skidmore <heyred@email.msn.com>
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Date: Friday, January 28, 2000 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] concept query


>We need the capacity to draw pictures. I understood Dan's proposal to be
>similar in concept to ring stiffening. Not as elegant as a monohull, but
>maybe easier to fab for the backyard builder? Maybe allowing the
combination
>of otherwise incompatible hull materials? - Joe
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Phil Nuytten <72020.572@compuserve.com>
>To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
>Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 9:32 PM
>Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] concept query
>
>
>> Hi, Dan:
>>         Gee, didnt we go thru' this some months ago?? Arrrrgh . .if the
>> hulls were arranged so that, at some point, no differential pressure
>> existed in the final sphere, then the thickness that a monohull would
have
>> to be to achieve that same state would be the same or less than the
>> combined hulls for a given inside final volume. period. Walk thru the
>> numbers . . you will see it is so. . .Remember that, until the outer hull
>> actually begins to move and transmits that movement to the fluid
>> surrounding the second hull - the second hull doesnt even know it's
there!
>> Phil Nuytten
>>
>
>
>